Process
Debrief Writer
Drafts debriefs that hold up.
One bidder gets three paragraphs of detail, another gets two lines, and the difference is the thing that gets argued about.
Each debrief drafted from the evaluation record, covering the same ground at the same depth for every bidder.
How it works
Drafts factual, consistent debriefs for unsuccessful bidders from the evaluation record, applying the same standard to everyone.
Good debriefs prevent protests. Inconsistent ones cause them.
It works from the evaluation record
Scores, evaluator notes and the criteria as published. Not impressions formed afterwards.
It covers the same ground for everyone
The same criteria, in the same order, at the same depth, so no bidder can say they were told less.
It stays factual
What the evaluation found, against what the solicitation asked for. No advice, no comparison to the winner beyond the record.
A person approves before sending
The debrief goes out over somebody\x{2019}s name. It is read and approved first, every time.
What it reads
Criteria covered per bidder
What stays out
Before it is sent
Ask it anything
Every answer quotes its page.
Answers come only from the documents on the run, and each one carries the citation you would have gone looking for.
Their technical approach scored below the threshold on two criteria: staffing plan, where the submission did not address the 24-hour requirement, and transition, where no plan was provided. Price was not the deciding factor.
What it will not do
Drafts only, from the evaluation record, applying the same standard to every bidder. A person reads and approves each one before it is sent.
Process
The rest of this stage
Each agent is scoped to one task, and they work on the same record.
Run it on a document you already have.
Tell us how your office works today and we will show you this agent on your own file.